| [ 1] EBBESSON S, O E. On the Roganization of Central Vi sual Path ways in Vertebrates[ J] . Brain Behaviour and Evolution, 1970, 3: 178~194.[ 2] HUNT S P, BRECHA N. Comparative Neuroblogy of the Optic Tectum[M] . New York and London: Pleum Press, 1984, 619~ 648.[ 3] COWAN W M, ADAMSON L, POWELL T P S. An Experimental Study of the Avian Visual System[ J] . Journal of Anatomy, 1961, 95:545~ 563.[ 4] NGO T D, DAVIES D C, EGEDI G Y, et al. A Phaseolus Lectin Anterograde Tracing Study of the Tectorotundal Projection in the Do -mestic Chick[ J] . J. Anat, 1994, 84: 129~ 136.[ 5] GGO H F,WU G Y, FROS T B J, et al. Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurotransmitters in the Nucleus Rotundus of Pigeons[ J] . VisualNeuroscience. 1995, 12: 819~ 825.[ 6] DIETL M M, CORTES R, PALACIOS JM. Neurotransmitter Receptors in the Avian Brain, II Muscarinic Cholinergic Recep tor s. BrainResearch. 1988, a( 439) : 360~ 365.[ 7] DIETL M M, CORTES R, PALACIOS J M. Neurotransmitter Recep tors in the Avian Brai n. II I GABA- benzodiazepine Recep tor s.Brain Research. 1998, b, ( 439) : 360~ 365.[ 8] BENOWITZ L I, KARTEN H J. Afferentation of the Nucleus Rotundus and Ectostriatum of the Pigeon: A Retograde Transport Analysis[ J] . Journal of Comparative Neurology, 1976, 167: 503~ 520.24[ 9] NIXDORF B E, BISCHOFF H J. Afferent Connections of the Ectostriatum and Vi sualWulst in the Zebra Finch ( Taeniopygia GuttataCastanotic Gould) - An HRP Study[ J] . Brain Research, 1982, 248: 9~ 17.[ 10] FROS T BM.Mechanisms for Echanisms for Dicriminating Object Motion From Sel f- induced Motion in the Pigeon[ A] . INGEL D,GOODALE M, MANSFUELD R. Advances in the Analysis of Visual Behaviour[ C] . Cambri ge: The MIT Press, 1982. 177~ 196.[ 11] FROS T B J,WYLIE D R,WANG Y C.The Processing of Object and Self- motion in the Tectofugal and Accessory Optic Pathway ofBirds[ J] . Vision Research, 1990, 30: 1677~ 1688.[ 12] FROS T B J. Relative Motion, Figure- ground Discrimination and Self- induced Optic Flow[ A] . MILES F A,WALLMAN J. VisualMotion and I ts Role in the Stabilisation of Gaze[ C] . Ameterdam: Elsevier, 1992. 676~ 783.[ 13] FROS T B J, DIFRANCO D E. Motion Specific Units in the Pigeon Op tic Tectum[ J] . Vision Research, 1976, 16: 1229~ 1234.[ 14] REVZIN A M. Some Characteristics of Wide0field Units in the Brain of the Pigeon[ J] . Brain, Behaviour, and Evolution, 1970, 333:195~ 204.[ 15] REVIN A M, KARTEN H. Rostral Projecti ons of the Op tic Tectum and the Nucleus Rotundus in the Pigeon[ J] . Brai n Research,1967, 33: 264~ 267.[ 16] REVZIN A M. Funtional Localization in the Nucleus Rotundus[ A] . GRANDA A M, MAXWELL J H. Neural Mechanisms of Be -haviour in the Pigeon[ C] . New York and London: Plenum Press, 1979. 165~ 176.[ 17] MAXUWELL J H, GRANDA A M. Receptive Fields of Behaviour in the Pi geon[M] . New York and London: Plenum Press, 1979. 177~ 198.[ 18] WAMG Y C, JIANG S Y, FROS T B J. Visual Processing in Pigeon Nucleus Rotundus: Luminance, Color, Motion, and Looming Subd- ivisi ons[ J] . Vision Research, 1993, 10: 21~ 30.[ 19] GRANDA A M, YAZULLA S. The Spectral Sensitivity of Single Units in the Nucleus Rotunds of Pi geon[ J] . Journal of General Phys- iology, 1971, 57: 363~ 384.[ 20] KIMBERLY R P, HOLDEN A L, BAMBOROUGH P. Response Characteristics of Pigeon Forebrain Cells to Visual Stimulation[ J] .Vision Research, 1971, 11: 475~ 478.[ 21] ZEIGLER, BISCHOF. Vision, Brain and Behavior in Birds[M] . Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press,Massachusettes Institute ofTechnology, 1993. 99~ 169.[ 22] HODLS W, BONBRIGHT J C. Intensi ty Difference Thresholds in Pigeon After Lesions of the Tectofugal Visiual Pathways[ J] . J.Comp. Psychol. Physiol, 1974, 87: 1013~ 1031.[ 23] HODOS W, KARTEN H J, BONBRIGHT J C. Visiual Intensity and Pattern Discrimination After Lesions of the Thalamofugal VisualPath way in Pigeons[ J] . J. Comp. Neur, 1973, 148: 447~ 467.[ 24] HODES W, KARTEN H J. Visual Intensi ty and Pattern Discrimination Deficits After Lesions of Estostriatum in Pigeon[ J] . J. Comp.Neur, 1970, 140: 53~ 68. |
